On September 25, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced settled cease-and-desist charges against GTT Communications, Inc. (“GTT”), a formerly publicly-traded multinational telecommunications and internet service provider company.  The SEC charged GTT with failing to disclose material information regarding unsupported accounting adjustments, which caused the company’s statements to be misleading with respect to its cost of revenue.  

Continue Reading SEC No-Penalty Settlement Signals Heightened Focus on Self-Reporting and Cooperation

At the September 21, 2023 Conference of the Global Investigations Review, Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Marshall Miller announced actions by the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to further incentivize companies engaged in M&A to prioritize compliance.  Miller affirmed that “acquiring companies should be rewarded—rather than penalized—when they engage in careful pre-acquisition diligence and post-acquisition integration to detect and remediate misconduct at the acquired company’s business.”[1] He noted that in practice, “… [Main Justice’s] Criminal Division has declined to take enforcement action against companies that have promptly and voluntarily self-disclosed misconduct uncovered in the mergers and acquisitions context and then remediated and cooperated with the Justice Department in prosecuting culpable individuals,” and that the DOJ “will be looking to apply that same approach Department-wide.”[2]  

Continue Reading DOJ Announces Additional Guidance on Voluntary Self-Disclosure in M&A Context

On September 1, 2023, U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen of the Eastern District of New York granted a judgment of acquittal in the latest FIFA bribery prosecution, holding that the federal honest services statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1346, does not cover foreign commercial bribery in light of recent Supreme Court precedent.

Continue Reading U.S. District Court Tosses FIFA Bribery Convictions, Finding Honest Services Statute Does Not Reach Foreign Commercial Bribery

On September 6th, the SEC Division of Examinations (the “Division”) published a risk alert with more detail on how it selects investment advisers for examinations and its process for determining the specific risk areas and issues to address in examination.  It noted that it leverages technology to conduct bulk data collection and analysis at both an industry and adviser level, as well as utilizing disclosure documents such as Form ADV and Form PF.  The risk alert is the second this year to address examination practices; a March 2023 risk alert provided an examination road map for new advisers and detailed a number of observations from recent exams.  Releases for the recently proposed and adopted amendments to Form ADV and Form PF, as well as the much anticipated final Private Fund Rules, have also noted the anticipated use of such disclosures and rules in examination and enforcement.  While some industry watchers have observed that the staff’s focus on rulemaking has slowed examination and enforcement activity, the staff have achieved a spate of recent settlements in connection with their sweeps on Marketing Rule compliance and Custody Rule violations.  This latest risk alert signals that advisers should expect continued scrutiny in these areas and additional sweep exams shortly after the compliance dates for new Private Fund Rules.[1]  Advisers should take into account the recent enforcement cases and Division publications as they review their policies and procedures, disclosures, compliance controls and practices relating to the Marketing Rule and these other high priority areas for the SEC.

Continue Reading SEC Risk Alert on Examinations: Who Gets Examined and Scope of Exams

Faced with the new challenges of a changing market, developing digital platforms and the consequential rise of new online commerce practice, the European Union (“EU”) has strengthened its current legislation on consumer protection.

Continue Reading Italian Transposition of the Omnibus Directive: the Reform in Pills

On August 23, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted new rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”) that will significantly impact private fund advisers (the “Final Rules”).  Although the Final Rules abandoned most of the headline prohibitions in the SEC’s original proposal (the “Proposed Rules”) from February 10, 2022 (discussed in our Alert Memo here) —  which created shock waves through the industry for its proscriptive requirements and tone — the Final Rules still contain onerous and market practice-changing requirements.  The Final Rules do not prohibit indemnification for negligence or ban the standard practice of accounting for taxes in clawback requirements, as the Proposed Rules threatened. But they do impose substantial new and detailed quarterly reporting requirements, two prohibitions and many new disclosure requirements for side letters and expense allocations, and restrict certain other activities, which the SEC explicitly warned that Exam and Enforcement Staff will be closely reviewing. With a few limited exceptions, all registered advisers (“RIAs”) will have their hands full implementing new and modified reporting, and RIAs, exempt reporting advisers (“ERAs”) and other advisers exempt from registration must develop processes —  and make difficult judgments —  about providing preferential treatment to selected investors and engaging in the targeted activities.

Continue Reading Fund Rules Dampened, Not Defanged: SEC’s final private fund rules drop proposed bans on certain activities, but still have bite.

On July 26, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”) adopted rules to enhance and standardize disclosure requirements related to cybersecurity incident reporting and cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance.

Continue Reading New SEC Disclosure Rules for Cybersecurity Incidents and Governance and Key Takeaways

On July 26, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice’s National Security Division, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security, and the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control jointly issued a compliance note summarizing voluntary self-disclosure policies applicable to U.S. sanctions, export controls, and other national security laws.

The note underscores the U.S. government’s focus on investigating and prosecuting violations of sanctions and export controls laws. While based largely on existing guidance and authorities, the note highlights the role of private-industry “gatekeepers” in sanctions and export control compliance, and U.S. authorities’ increasing emphasis on disclosures in conjunction with potential enforcement.

Please click here to read the full alert memorandum.

On July 26, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) proposed new rules targeting the use of predictive data analytics and artificial intelligence (“AI”) by registered investment advisers (“RIAs”) and broker-dealers.[1]  The new proposed rules focus on the potential for conflicts of interest and the possibility that newer, more complex analytics models (including those using AI) might optimize decision making for RIAs and broker-dealers by placing those firms’ interests above the interests of their clients.[2]  The proposed rules would require RIAs and broker-dealers to: (i) evaluate whether their use of technologies “that optimize for, predict, forecast or direct investment-related behaviors or outcomes” create such a conflict of interest, and (ii) either stop using or address the effects of tools that place a firm’s interests before the interests of clients.  RIAs and broker-dealers will also will be required to adopt policies to ensure compliance with the new proposed rules.[3] 

Continue Reading SEC Proposes Rules Limiting the Use of Artificial Intelligence by Registered Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers

Companies face new pressures relating to the potential environmental impact of their products and services. In recent years, ESG has become a focal point about how companies conduct their business and there has been an increase in pledges to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, marketing of environmentally friendly products and reporting on environmental, social and corporate governance/ESG metrics. As with any other statements that companies make, it is important that such statements are substantiated and accurate. More and more authorities and private litigants are targeting alleged greenwashing, which includes misstating the use of environmental considerations, overstating the environmental benefits, and underplaying the environmental risks relating to products. In this alert memo, we outline legal theories that U.S. authorities and private litigants have pursued relating to greenwashing, best practices in making environmental claims, disclosure and climate commitments and potential defenses against allegations of greenwashing.

Please click here to read the full alert memorandum.