On May 12, 2025, the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced several policy changes related to its approach to white collar criminal enforcement.  Matthew R. Galeotti, the current head of the Criminal Division, noted that DOJ would be “turning a new page on white-collar and corporate enforcement” and emphasizing the principles of “focus, fairness and efficiency” in its investigations and prosecutions.  As part of this policy roll-out, DOJ issued a new White Collar Enforcement Plan (the “Enforcement Plan”) and key revisions to the Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (“CEP”), Monitor Selection Policy, and Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program.[1] 

Continue Reading DOJ Criminal Division Announces White Collar Enforcement Plan and Revisions to Three Key Policies

On April 11, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice, National Security Division (“DOJ”) issued a compliance guide (“Compliance Guide”), a set of frequently asked questions (“FAQs”), and a 90-day limited enforcement policy (“Enforcement Policy”) relating to implementation of the Data Security Program, codified at 28 C.F.R. Part 202 (“DSP”).  The DSP is a regulatory program designed to prevent certain countries of concern—China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela—and covered persons from having access to Americans’ bulk sensitive personal data and U.S. government-related data.  The DSP largely went into effect on April 8, 2025. 

Continue Reading DOJ Issues Additional Guidance as Data Security Program Enters into Effect; Limits Enforcement for First 90 Days

Earlier this month, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce), Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) held its annual Update Conference on Export Controls and Policy (the Conference).  During the Conference, key government officials signaled an intent to ramp up enforcement of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) going forward.  For example, in opening remarks to Conference attendees, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said there would be a “dramatic” increase in enforcement by BIS under the Trump administration, including increased fines and penalties for parties that violate the EAR.

Continue Reading U.S. Government Signals Intent to Increase Enforcement of U.S. Export Controls

On March 20, 2025, the United Kingdom’s Serious Fraud Office (“SFO”), France’s Parquet National Financier (“PNF”), and Switzerland’s Office of the Attorney General (“OAG”) signed a founding statement to establish a new International Anti-Corruption Prosecutorial Taskforce.[1]  The new taskforce will include a Leadership Group to exchange insight and strategy, as well as a Working Group focused on strengthening collaboration and cooperation in anti-corruption cases.[2]

Continue Reading New Anti-Corruption Taskforce Announced by Authorities in the UK, France, and Switzerland

As discussed in our last Corporate Transparent Act (CTA) update, the U.S. Treasury Department announced on March 2 that it planned to issue an interim rule excluding U.S. companies and citizens from CTA reporting obligations. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has now done so, limiting the scope of the CTA to non-U.S. parties. This will dramatically reduce the operational burdens and costs of the CTA for registered investment advisers.

Continue Reading FinCEN Eliminates CTA Requirements for All U.S. Companies and U.S. Individuals

On Wednesday evening, the SEC Staff published two new FAQs relating to the presentation of gross and net performance under the Investment Advisers Act Marketing Rule, the sweeping 2022 overhaul of the advertising and endorsement restrictions applicable to registered investment advisers (“RIAs”).  Both FAQs provide significant relief from prior Staff interpretations of the Marketing Rule and will dramatically reduce compliance burdens for RIAs in the areas of performance of individual investments and certain performance “characteristics” of portfolios and investments.  The limited open questions raised by new FAQs pale in comparison to the issues RIAs faced with the prior interpretations.

Continue Reading SEC Staff Reverses Some “Gross/Net” Marketing Rule Guidance

We noted in our last Corporate Transparent Act (CTA) update that on February 27, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau of the U.S. Treasury Department, announced that it would not take any enforcement actions against any company that does not file or update beneficial ownership information required under the CTA until after FinCEN issued a new interim rule.  The Treasury Department announced yesterday that it will not enforce any penalties or fines against “U.S. citizens or domestic reporting companies or their beneficial owners” for not filing this information even after the new interim rule.  Instead, the Treasury Department said that it will issue a proposed rulemaking “that will narrow the scope of the rule to foreign reporting companies only.” 

Continue Reading Trump Administration Proposes Eliminating CTA Requirements for All U.S. Companies

Amid various ongoing litigation concerning the constitutionality of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) had announced on February 19, 2025, that it was extending the CTA beneficial ownership information filing deadline for most companies to March 21, 2025 (see Client Alert here).  Now, FinCEN has taken a step further, announcing yesterday “that it will not issue any fines or penalties or take any other enforcement actions against any companies based on any failure to file or update” any reports mandated by the CTA.  According to FinCEN, “no enforcement actions will be taken, until a forthcoming interim final rule becomes effective.”  FinCEN states that it will issue the interim rule no later than March 21, 2025, and the new rule will establish new CTA filing deadlines. 

Continue Reading FinCEN Pauses All CTA Filing Obligations and Will Issue New Rules

As previously reported (see CTA client alert), on January 23, 2025, in Texas Top Cop Shop v. Bondi, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed an injunction barring enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), but a different Texas trial court’s injunction remained in place.  On February 18, that second court, in Smith v. United States Department of the Treasury, lifted its injunction against CTA enforcement, relying on the Supreme Court ruling.  Oral argument in Texas Top Cop Shop remains scheduled before the Fifth Circuit on April 1, 2025.

Continue Reading Remaining Injunction Pausing Corporate Transparency Act is Lifted; FinCEN Extends General Filing Deadline to March 21; Statute’s Future Remains Uncertain

For more insights and analysis from Cleary lawyers on policy and regulatory developments from a legal perspective, visit What to Expect From a Second Trump Administration.

The new administration has recently taken steps to reduce or even eliminate the role of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in the supervision of certain financial institutions and the enforcement of federal consumer protection statutes.  While these actions represent a significant departure from the prior administration’s approach to consumer protection, and while a less active CFPB will likely reduce the federal regulatory burden on entities that have been subject to CFPB supervision, consumer financial protection enforcement is not likely to disappear. Instead, it will likely shift to state attorneys general (AG), which had already been active, along with the CFPB, in consumer protection.  This means entities that provide products or services in the consumer finance space will need to continue to be attentive to federal consumer protection statutes (such as the Consumer Financial Protection Act) that can be enforced by states, to state consumer protection statutes, and to state AG inquiries.

Continue Reading Consumer Protection Compliance Remains Crucial in Spite of CFPB Work Stoppage