SEC Guidance

Subscribe to SEC Guidance via RSS

On Wednesday evening, the SEC Staff published two new FAQs relating to the presentation of gross and net performance under the Investment Advisers Act Marketing Rule, the sweeping 2022 overhaul of the advertising and endorsement restrictions applicable to registered investment advisers (“RIAs”).  Both FAQs provide significant relief from prior Staff interpretations of the Marketing Rule and will dramatically reduce compliance burdens for RIAs in the areas of performance of individual investments and certain performance “characteristics” of portfolios and investments.  The limited open questions raised by new FAQs pale in comparison to the issues RIAs faced with the prior interpretations.Continue Reading SEC Staff Reverses Some “Gross/Net” Marketing Rule Guidance

The following is part of our annual publication Selected Issues for Boards of Directors in 2025. Explore all topics or download the PDF.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) both had active enforcement years in 2024. The SEC’s aggressive focus on crypto enforcement continued, resulting in the filing and continued litigation of several cases in federal courts nationwide. The DOJ announced a number of policy updates in 2024, including guidance related to voluntary disclosures and corporate enforcement, and remained active in the foreign corruption and national security spaces. Finally, both the SEC and DOJ have increased their focus on AI and new technologies, showing increasing concern about the risks associated with AI, with the DOJ issuing guidance on AI in compliance programs and the SEC bringing cases related to misleading marketing about the use of AI in investment strategies. As noted more fully below, with the incoming Trump Administration, enforcement priorities at both SEC and DOJ are expected to shift. The SEC is expected to have a renewed focus on traditional enforcement areas, such as accounting fraud, misrepresentations in securities offerings and insider trading, with significant reductions in enforcement activity related to crypto, cyber incidents and ESG issues. The DOJ is likely to continue its focus on FCPA and national security (including sanctions and export controls), while devoting increasing resources to immigration and violent crime. Additionally, the benefits of cooperation are likely to increase at both the SEC and DOJ, with the potential for reduced penalties for companies able to effectively demonstrate their cooperation and self-remediation.Continue Reading An Active Year in Enforcement, with Changes to Come

Introduction

Whistleblower programs have proliferated and been growing in importance in the criminal and regulatory enforcement landscape globally.  In this three-part series, we first discuss recent developments in whistleblower programs in the United States.  Second, we review whistleblower initiatives in other non-U.S. jurisdictions over the past year.  Third, we address how developments in whistleblower programs impact corporations.Continue Reading Whistleblowing in Focus: Recent Developments, Emerging Issues, and Considerations for Companies. Part One: Developments in the U.S.

On November 22, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced its enforcement results for the 2024 fiscal year with a record $8.2 billion in financial remedies.[1]  At the same time, a few cases and sweeps comprised the vast bulk of that amount, and the number of cases brought dropped by 26%.  In a press release announcing the results, Acting Enforcement Director Sanjay Wadhwa touted the agency’s “high impact enforcement actions” and noted “stepped up efforts” by market participants to self-report their own potential wrongdoing, cooperate in SEC investigations, and remediate any shortcomings.  Chair Gary Gensler, who recently announced he will step down at the start of the next Trump presidency, described the Enforcement Division as a “steadfast cop on the beat.”  Set forth below are key highlights on enforcement trends from the past year, as well as predictions for what the next year may hold under a new administration.Continue Reading SEC FY 2024 Enforcement Results: Record Dollars But Many Fewer Cases

On October 22, 2024, the SEC announced settled enforcement actions charging four companies with making materially misleading disclosures regarding cybersecurity risks and intrusions. These cases mark the first to bring charges against companies who were downstream victims of the well-known cyber-attack on software company SolarWinds. The four companies were providers of IT services and digital communications products and settled the charges for amounts ranging from $990,000 to $4 million.Continue Reading SEC Charges Four Companies Impacted by Data Breach with Misleading Cyber Disclosures

On October 25, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted amendments to certain rules in the Covered Clearing Agency Standards (the “Amendments”) aimed at improving risk management and resilience of covered clearing agencies (“CCAs”).  Although not directly relevant to firms who are participants in one of the clearing agencies, the amendments could result in changes to margin requirements imposed by clearing agencies.  The Amendments:Continue Reading Clearing Agency Participants Take Note: Covered Clearing Agency Resilience Rules Could Bring New Margin Requirements

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Division of Examinations (the “Division”) released its 2025 examination priorities on October 21, 2024 (the “2025 Priorities”).  The 2025 Priorities highlight a wide range of topics for entities subject to SEC examinations, particularly investment advisers and broker-dealers.  The topics should be very familiar, as they largely continue recent focus areas for not only the Examinations Division but also the Enforcement Division.Continue Reading SEC 2025 Exam Priorities: Private Funds, Cyber, Crypto, and New Rule Compliance

On September 18, 2024, the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) unanimously adopted new rules amending Regulation NMS (the “Amendments”). The Amendments (1) establish new minimum pricing increments (or “tick sizes”) for certain stocks priced above $1.00, (2) establish a new maximum fee for access to quotations, and require that all such fees be calculable as of the transaction date, and (3) accelerate the implementation of operational amendments to the “round lot” and “odd-lot information” definitions previously adopted to harmonize with the adopted NMS amendments.Continue Reading The Next Market Structure Rule Arrives: SEC Adopts New Minimum Pricing Increments and Access Fee Caps

In the past few weeks, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has announced three settled enforcement actions alleging violations of the internal controls provisions of the federal securities laws.  The cases are notable less for the SEC penalties involved—which ranged from no penalty to $400,000—but rather for the other, more dire consequences the companies experienced as a result of internal controls failures, such as financial restatements, delayed SEC filings that led to an exchange delisting, and serious employee misconduct that went unchecked.  The cases underscore the importance of establishing and maintaining effective systems of internal control over financial reporting. Continue Reading Trio of SEC Enforcement Actions Underscores Importance of Internal Controls, Including in M&A Context

On March 27, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced amendments to the Internet Adviser Exemption, which permits investment advisers that provide advisory services through the internet (“Internet Investment Advisers”) to register with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) if they do not otherwise have enough assets under management to be eligible for registration.[1]  The final rule seeks to address technological and industry advancements since the original Internet Adviser Exemption was adopted in 2002.  The final rule also amends the interactive website requirement, eliminates the exception for advisers with de minimis non-internet clients, and imposes additional reporting requirements for Internet Investment Advisers on Form ADV.Continue Reading SEC Announces Reforms for Internet Investment Advisers