As discussed in our last Corporate Transparent Act (CTA) update, the U.S. Treasury Department announced on March 2 that it planned to issue an interim rule excluding U.S. companies and citizens from CTA reporting obligations. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has now done so, limiting the scope of the CTA to non-U.S. parties. This will dramatically reduce the operational burdens and costs of the CTA for registered investment advisers.Continue Reading FinCEN Eliminates CTA Requirements for All U.S. Companies and U.S. Individuals
Trump Administration Proposes Eliminating CTA Requirements for All U.S. Companies
We noted in our last Corporate Transparent Act (CTA) update that on February 27, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau of the U.S. Treasury Department, announced that it would not take any enforcement actions against any company that does not file or update beneficial ownership information required under the CTA until after FinCEN issued a new interim rule. The Treasury Department announced yesterday that it will not enforce any penalties or fines against “U.S. citizens or domestic reporting companies or their beneficial owners” for not filing this information even after the new interim rule. Instead, the Treasury Department said that it will issue a proposed rulemaking “that will narrow the scope of the rule to foreign reporting companies only.” Continue Reading Trump Administration Proposes Eliminating CTA Requirements for All U.S. Companies
FinCEN Pauses All CTA Filing Obligations and Will Issue New Rules
Amid various ongoing litigation concerning the constitutionality of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), the U.S. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) had announced on February 19, 2025, that it was extending the CTA beneficial ownership information filing deadline for most companies to March 21, 2025 (see Client Alert here). Now, FinCEN has taken a step further, announcing yesterday “that it will not issue any fines or penalties or take any other enforcement actions against any companies based on any failure to file or update” any reports mandated by the CTA. According to FinCEN, “no enforcement actions will be taken, until a forthcoming interim final rule becomes effective.” FinCEN states that it will issue the interim rule no later than March 21, 2025, and the new rule will establish new CTA filing deadlines. Continue Reading FinCEN Pauses All CTA Filing Obligations and Will Issue New Rules
Remaining Injunction Pausing Corporate Transparency Act is Lifted; FinCEN Extends General Filing Deadline to March 21; Statute’s Future Remains Uncertain
As previously reported (see CTA client alert), on January 23, 2025, in Texas Top Cop Shop v. Bondi, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed an injunction barring enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), but a different Texas trial court’s injunction remained in place. On February 18, that second court, in Smith v. United States Department of the Treasury, lifted its injunction against CTA enforcement, relying on the Supreme Court ruling. Oral argument in Texas Top Cop Shop remains scheduled before the Fifth Circuit on April 1, 2025.Continue Reading Remaining Injunction Pausing Corporate Transparency Act is Lifted; FinCEN Extends General Filing Deadline to March 21; Statute’s Future Remains Uncertain
Consumer Protection Compliance Remains Crucial in Spite of CFPB Work Stoppage
For more insights and analysis from Cleary lawyers on policy and regulatory developments from a legal perspective, visit What to Expect From a Second Trump Administration.
The new administration has recently taken steps to reduce or even eliminate the role of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) in the supervision of certain financial institutions and the enforcement of federal consumer protection statutes. While these actions represent a significant departure from the prior administration’s approach to consumer protection, and while a less active CFPB will likely reduce the federal regulatory burden on entities that have been subject to CFPB supervision, consumer financial protection enforcement is not likely to disappear. Instead, it will likely shift to state attorneys general (AG), which had already been active, along with the CFPB, in consumer protection. This means entities that provide products or services in the consumer finance space will need to continue to be attentive to federal consumer protection statutes (such as the Consumer Financial Protection Act) that can be enforced by states, to state consumer protection statutes, and to state AG inquiries.Continue Reading Consumer Protection Compliance Remains Crucial in Spite of CFPB Work Stoppage
Trump Administration Continues Defense of Corporate Transparency Act, Indicates FinCEN’s Flexibility On Deadlines And Scope
As of our last client update on the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) litigation (see CTA client alert), the U.S. Supreme Court, in an 8-1 ruling, lifted a nationwide injunction issued by a Texas trial court in Texas Top Cop Shop v. Bondi that had blocked CTA enforcement, but another nationwide injunction issued by another Texas trial court in Smith v. United States Department of the Treasury continued to stall CTA implementation. Now, the new Trump Administration, in its first formal actions related to the CTA litigations, (i) on February 5, filed a notice of appeal and motion to stay the injunction in Smith, and (ii) on February 7, filed a brief supporting the constitutionality of the CTA in Texas Top Cop Shop. Given the Supreme Court’s decision in Texas Top Cop Shop to lift the injunction against CTA enforcement, we believe the government’s effort to stay the injunction in Smith is likely to succeed.Continue Reading Trump Administration Continues Defense of Corporate Transparency Act, Indicates FinCEN’s Flexibility On Deadlines And Scope
U.S. Supreme Court Lifts Initial Injunction Against Enforcement Of Corporate Transparency Act, But A Separate Injunction Continues To Halt Implementation
The long and winding road of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) litigation (as discussed in our most recent CTA client alert) has taken another turn, and this time companies are driving blind. On New Year’s Eve, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) asked the U.S. Supreme Court to lift the injunction imposed by a Texas court and let the law go into effect while the legal contest over the constitutionality of the law is pending. Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court resoundingly agreed with the DOJ. In an 8-1 ruling, the nation’s highest Court lifted the stay on enforcement of the statute. One might assume that the Supreme Court ruling ended the injunction issue, but a separate order issued by a different federal judge in Texas blocking enforcement of the statute nationwide remains in place.Continue Reading U.S. Supreme Court Lifts Initial Injunction Against Enforcement Of Corporate Transparency Act, But A Separate Injunction Continues To Halt Implementation
DOJ Appeals CTA Injunction; FinCEN Suspends Filing Requirement
As outlined in our prior update, on December 3, 2024, a Texas federal district court issued a preliminary injunction that temporarily blocks the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and its implementing regulations from taking effect nationwide. Continue Reading DOJ Appeals CTA Injunction; FinCEN Suspends Filing Requirement
Federal District Court Enjoins Enforcement of U.S. Corporate Transparency Act
We want to make you aware that yesterday, a Texas federal district court issued a nationwide preliminary injunction temporarily blocking the effectiveness of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and its implementing regulations, which require certain companies (including certain non-U.S. companies registered to conduct business in the United States) to disclose beneficial ownership information to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.Continue Reading Federal District Court Enjoins Enforcement of U.S. Corporate Transparency Act
Unsealed Indictment Illustrates Interplay Between Criminal and Civil Liability For Theft Of Trade Secrets
On February 7, 2022, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois unsealed an indictment against Hytera Communications Corporation, Ltd. (“Hytera”), a company headquartered in Shenzhen, China, and several individuals, charging each with conspiracy to commit theft of trade secrets.[1] The indictment’s allegations parallel those made in two civil complaints Motorola Solutions Inc. (“Motorola”) filed against Hytera for theft of trade secrets and patent infringement in the same Court in 2017.[2]
Continue Reading Unsealed Indictment Illustrates Interplay Between Criminal and Civil Liability For Theft Of Trade Secrets