United States

Subscribe to United States via RSS

On November 22, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced its enforcement results for the 2024 fiscal year with a record $8.2 billion in financial remedies.[1]  At the same time, a few cases and sweeps comprised the vast bulk of that amount, and the number of cases brought dropped by 26%.  In a press release announcing the results, Acting Enforcement Director Sanjay Wadhwa touted the agency’s “high impact enforcement actions” and noted “stepped up efforts” by market participants to self-report their own potential wrongdoing, cooperate in SEC investigations, and remediate any shortcomings.  Chair Gary Gensler, who recently announced he will step down at the start of the next Trump presidency, described the Enforcement Division as a “steadfast cop on the beat.”  Set forth below are key highlights on enforcement trends from the past year, as well as predictions for what the next year may hold under a new administration.Continue Reading SEC FY 2024 Enforcement Results: Record Dollars But Many Fewer Cases

On November 14, 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) Antitrust Division (the “Division”) released guidance for the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs in Criminal Antitrust Investigations (the “Guidance”). The Guidance will be used by the Division in assessing the adequacy and effectiveness of a company’s antitrust compliance program when making a charging or resolution decision.[1]Continue Reading DOJ Antitrust Creates Guidance for Evaluating Antitrust Compliance Programs

On October 22, 2024, the SEC announced settled enforcement actions charging four companies with making materially misleading disclosures regarding cybersecurity risks and intrusions. These cases mark the first to bring charges against companies who were downstream victims of the well-known cyber-attack on software company SolarWinds. The four companies were providers of IT services and digital communications products and settled the charges for amounts ranging from $990,000 to $4 million.Continue Reading SEC Charges Four Companies Impacted by Data Breach with Misleading Cyber Disclosures

On October 25, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted amendments to certain rules in the Covered Clearing Agency Standards (the “Amendments”) aimed at improving risk management and resilience of covered clearing agencies (“CCAs”).  Although not directly relevant to firms who are participants in one of the clearing agencies, the amendments could result in changes to margin requirements imposed by clearing agencies.  The Amendments:Continue Reading Clearing Agency Participants Take Note: Covered Clearing Agency Resilience Rules Could Bring New Margin Requirements

On September 18, 2024, the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) unanimously adopted new rules amending Regulation NMS (the “Amendments”). The Amendments (1) establish new minimum pricing increments (or “tick sizes”) for certain stocks priced above $1.00, (2) establish a new maximum fee for access to quotations, and require that all such fees be calculable as of the transaction date, and (3) accelerate the implementation of operational amendments to the “round lot” and “odd-lot information” definitions previously adopted to harmonize with the adopted NMS amendments.Continue Reading The Next Market Structure Rule Arrives: SEC Adopts New Minimum Pricing Increments and Access Fee Caps

In the past few weeks, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has announced three settled enforcement actions alleging violations of the internal controls provisions of the federal securities laws.  The cases are notable less for the SEC penalties involved—which ranged from no penalty to $400,000—but rather for the other, more dire consequences the companies experienced as a result of internal controls failures, such as financial restatements, delayed SEC filings that led to an exchange delisting, and serious employee misconduct that went unchecked.  The cases underscore the importance of establishing and maintaining effective systems of internal control over financial reporting. Continue Reading Trio of SEC Enforcement Actions Underscores Importance of Internal Controls, Including in M&A Context

Earlier this month, the California State Budget released for approval by the state legislature included an updated version of Senate Bill 54 (the “VC Diversity Law”).  The latest version contains several updates to the VC Diversity Law, including revisions to the definition of “covered entity;” that said, as we discuss below, it is not clear that the scope of coverage will meaningfully differ.  The updates also delay the initial reporting date to March 1, 2026 (from the original date of March 1, 2025), and reflect a change to the California governmental division responsible for enforcing the law.Continue Reading California Updates Diversity Reporting Law for Venture Capital Funds to Start in 2026

What’s next after PFAR? In its highly-awaited June 5th opinion, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated all of the SEC’s Private Fund Adviser rules (“PFAR”), agreeing with industry trade associations that the SEC lacked the necessary statutory authority to adopt PFAR. In our latest Client Alert, we examine the opinion, aspects of…

With its decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Keener (May 29, 2024), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has now twice in the span of four months affirmed a broad interpretation of who is considered a “dealer” for purposes of the securities laws. More specifically, the Eleventh Circuit upheld the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) position that a person engaged in the business of purchasing—for its own account—convertible debt notes from microcap issuers (also referred to as “penny-stock” companies), converting the notes into common stock, and selling that stock in the market meets the definition of a “dealer” under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and must therefore be registered as a dealer with the SEC. The decision in Keener closely tracked the same Court’s decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Almagarby, Microcap Equity Group (February 14, 2024), in which the Eleventh Circuit agreed with the SEC that the plaintiff Almagarby had been acting as an unregistered “dealer” in violation of the Exchange Act by obtaining convertible debt of microcap companies for his own account, converting the debt into common stock, and then selling the stock. Continue Reading Keener, Almagarby, and the Scope of the “Dealer” Definition: Potential Implications for Fund Managers and other Investors

On June 5, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its opinion on National Association of Private Fund Managers et. al. vs. Securities and Exchange Commission, the lawsuit brought by a group of trade associations representing the private funds industry against the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) challenging the validity and enforceability of the SEC’s Private Fund Adviser Rules (“PFAR”). …
Continue Reading Fifth Circuit Vacates Private Fund Adviser Rules in Entirety